The Court sentenced the advocate to six months in simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs. The accused advocate was charged on the basis of a series of transgressions, against a Civil Judge Junior Division.
During the course of a hearing of a case argued by the advocate, the judge ordered the return of certain written arguments. The advocate then hurled abuses at the judge, making allegations of bribery and corruption. The judge reported this altercation, and the Chief Justice of the High Court initiated proceedings against the advocate.
Thereafter, the advocate filed an affidavit making allegations of corruption and casteist bias against the judge and several other judicial officers. The advocate then filed a writ petition before the High Court, seeking an inquiry by an independent agency or the CBI against the officers.
The High Court dismissed this petition and levied costs of Rs. Just at the heels of this, several lawyers including the contemnor-advocate surrounded the judge and intimidated him over questions of integrity.
It may be noted here that strikes by lawyers are illegal and unconstitutional, except in the rarest of rare cases, decided by the judge heading the Court, and for no more than one day see Ex-Capt. Haris Uppal.चेक बाउंस होने पर क्या करें - Dishonour of Cheque - Cheque Bounce - Dhananjay Sharma
Interestingly, the Court found the accused advocate guilty for scandalizing or lowering the authority of the Court per sec. In our submissions to the Law Commission of India in response to the Consultation Paper on Media Law in Junewe had argued for the removal of the offense of scandalizing the court from sec.
The rationale offered by Courts in support of the offense of scandalizing the courts is that public respect and confidence for the authority of courts is important for the efficient administration of justice.
However, as free speech enthusiasts often argue, in the court of public opinion, the possibility of the confidence of judiciary plummeting is greater, not lesser, when criticism is suppressed.
A hallmark of any modern democracy is the vigorous critique of public institutions. If the judiciary is a public institution — which it is — then it should be subject to the same degree of scrutiny as, say, the Executive.
Which is not to say that contempt of court powers is not worthy of protection at all. Indeed, contempt powers are expressly recognized as a justifiable restriction to free speech under Article 19 2 of the Constitution.
Gautam Bhatia provides an interesting analysis of the offense of scandalizing the court see here and here. After surveying the positions in the US, the UK, and the Privy Council which take a positively speech-protective stance in this regardhe draws an analogy with seditious libel.
If protection of the reputation of judges as opposed to the reputation of the Court is the underlying and unstated end, then it would be more appropriate for the Court to use alternative means to remedy personal injury to the judges. Indeed, the accused advocate argued that criminal defamation sec. The court disagreed.Case Status includes information on pending or decided cases.
The information can be attained from the recorded databases of the concerned courts. Case Status also includes the orders signed by the courts.
To recover the data from the Case Status,case number, name of the petitioner, advocate name, and details of lower court are required. These details are necessary for retrieval of data from any HighCourt Case Status. Though information on High Court Case Status can be attained without any problem, there are some special cases which are sealed and has no access to its information. Basically, the process does not involve any cost, but there are exceptional cases where some fee is to be paid.
On the submission of the above mentioned details, you will get an access to any High Court Case Status and retrieve data concerning your matter of interest. If having any doubts concerning any legal matter or similar issues, consult a lawyer. An option of getting the information on High Court Case Status is also available online. When searching on the internet, a link on National Information appears. After logging in, information like case number including practically all kinds of casesadvocate name in full or parttext which includes a part of the case or its judgement and its dateand orders by text are asked for.
When filled in and submitted, the current case status appears on the screen. This is a much easier way of getting the information on High Court Case Status without any hassle.Circular Instructions to the Prl. Revised Guidelines for transfers and postings of Judicial Officers of all caders working in the State of Andhra Pradesh - Regarding Recruitment - The candidates show in Appendix No. IV of the notification dated Purushottam Kumar, Registrar Enquiries - Extension of term of appointment.
Data under Commercial Courts Act, Notice dated Declaration of Holiday on Saturday, the 22nd February, Posting of Special Magistrate Orders - Issued. Notification along with lists of eligible and in-eligible for recruitment to the post of district judges direct recruitment and aacclerated recruitment by tranfer notified for the year The following members are appointed to Court Masters and Personal seretaries to the hon'ble judges and registrars, High Court of Andhra Pradesh.
National Lok Adalat cases National Lok Adalat presitting cases date Releif arrangements to the nominated officers to participate in the national conference at Tamilnadu state Judicial academy Chennai -B. Spl Sec. National Lok Adalat cases to be held on Feb District allocation to Honorable Judges. Notice Swearing New Judges. National Lok Adalat causelist on Feb Filling up of the post of presenting officer in the National Human Rights Commission on deputation basis - Willingness from the eligible officers.
Recruitment to 32 posts of District judge Entry Level in the Tamilnadu state judicial service. Recruitment to 19 posts of Delhi higher judicial service by way of direct recruitment. Skip to Main Content. Display Board. Visitor Pass. Order Search.Officially, it is also known as the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. Previously, this court came into being at Agra in order to look at the judicial control of the North Western Provinces in British India.
The court was later on transferred to Allahabad. Its name was changed to Allahabad High Court on March 11, When India gained independence the High Court of Allahabad became the highest seat of justice in the state of Uttar Pradesh after it became a part of the Republic of India in It is with the help of Case Status site that the litigants will be provided the latest Allahabad high court case status which is either pending or one which has been disposed of by any other High Court in the country and also from the Supreme Court.
A litigant will be able to get the information regarding Allahabad high court case status from the databases of the solicited courts. They will also be able to get the daily orders. These daily orders are available immediately after the orders have been signed by the court.
How to check the status of a case which is pending in the Allahabad High Court? The litigants or the user can search for the Allahabad high court case status via the following simple steps:. They will then have to select the case number. Finally they will also have to click on the Lower court detail. The litigant will soon be directed to the required case. So, this is simply some of the ways with the help of which the litigants will be able to check their case status.Restraint on the recovery of taxes will put the government at prejudice due to the closure of financial year on March 31, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said, adding there is a mechanism for making online payment of taxes.
Citing the hearing being taken up in the Supreme Court, sources in the state government revealed that authorities might ask for more time for filing the compliance report.
Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench
The complainant in the case, Nutan Thakur, alleged that derogatory remarks and hashtags were made to trend on social media, especially on Twitter. The hoardings carried pictures of rape accused Chinmayanand and Unnao rape convict Kuldeep Sengar along with the details of their criminal cases. The Supreme Court, however, did not pass any interim order and said the matter would be heard next week by a three-judge bench.
The appeal filed by the state is scheduled to be heard on Thursday by a vacation bench of justices U U Lalit and Aniruddha Bose, advocate general for Uttar Pradesh Raghvendra Singh said. The complaint submitted by an activist and lawyer, Nutan Thakur, alleged that the derogatory remarks against the judges were part of a "conspiracy". The Allahabad High Court on Monday had said the government's move to display photographs and personal details of the accused on roadside hoardings was "an unwarranted interference in privacy".
UP CM Adityanath said that his government's first priority is the security of the state's 23 crore people.
Whatever decision is in the public interest, that will be taken. The division bench which comprised of Justice Manoj Mishra and Justice Deepak Verma noted that the coordinate bench of the High Court had entertained a similar petition in another case and had sought replies from the state government. The Uttar Pradesh government had opposed the petition on the ground that there was no need for a CBI probe in the case as three inquires were already underway.
The district administration's decision to put up hoardings with photos and addresses of 53 anti-CAA protesters at prominent crossings across the city was criticised as a violation of human rights. The BJP politician also participated in an event organised by the local Hindu Yuva Vahini unit at the ashram, where he praised kar sevaks who took part in the Ayodhya movement.
A bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan and Naveen Sinha rejected the plea saying that the Allahabad High Court has given reasons in its order granting bail to Chinmayanand and it requires no interference. The NHRC recommendations include paying compensation to six students who were grievously injured in the police lathicharge and disciplinary action against the policemen seen in CCTV footage indulging in caning students and damaging two-wheelers on the university campus.
The bench said the government notice violated the guidelines laid down by the apex court in when it heard the matter related to Destruction of Public and Private Properties Vs State of AP and others. Follow Us On. All News Photos Videos. Live TV. Full Scorecard. Countdown To Elections Results. Health Dep.Applicant Kamla Prasad, who superannuated on A under Section 19 of Administrative Tribunals Act, for the following relief s : a.
The applicant alleges that he was selected and appointed as Assistant Craftsman on He says that he was entitled to pension, as he put in more than 12 years in service, but was not given so, he filed one O. The applicant has prayed for quashing the order dated There appears to be no dispute that the applicant gave one application dated It was said that on account of sudden death of late Sri Sat Saran Lal Srivastava, the family was in distress as there was no earning member left to pull on the family.
Tag: Case status of Allahabad High court
It appears that the applicant gave reminders pressing for decision on h In this O. A, the application No. Brief facts of the case are that the applicant No. The husband of the applicant No. Admittedly, the deceased has not left any legal heir. Thereafter, the applicant No. Earlier it is stated that the applicant No. Later on it is stated that the applicant No. Based on these facts, the applicant No. Since the facts and the reliefs sought for in both the applications are similar in nature, therefore, both the OA's are decided by a common order.
The brief facts of the case are that the applicant No. Later on the Mason Mistri change to Supervisor Works in the year from the beginning the appointment of the appl The applicant, Anil Kumar " Kureel ", has prayed for quashing order dated There is no dispute that applicant's father namely late Dhani Ram was the employee of the respondents and he died on There is further no dispute that applicant gave application 3. It appears that respondent No.
The applicant is challenging this letter on several grounds and one of the grounds is that it is non-speaking. The applicant in this O. A is an Ex Casual Labourwho had worked with the Railways from As per submission made by the applicant and as per Annexure A- 3 Pg. Some Ex casual laboureres including the applicant went to the Labour Court under Industrial Dispute Act for settlement of their claim. In pursuance of the direction of the Hon'ble High Court, the respondents under took the exercise for special drive for considering the cases of ex casual laboureres for screening and subsequent regularization.
The circular for special drive was issued from the office of DRM, Jhansi on As per circular, the last date for furnishing the applications with necessary details was There are two segments of the high Cort here due to having a vast empire. Cort How many Cause have been salvage pending in the same order all this post can help you.
Download Android Apps. While all efforts have been made to make the Information available on this Website as Authentic as possible. Facebook Twitter Instagram Telegram. Users can access larger bench decisions, referred cases, leading or bunch cases, important decisions that were in headlines and Indian Law Report Check cause list of Lucknow bench of Allahabad High Court- Check the status of pending and disposed cases of Lucknow Bench of Allahabad High Court. Users can provide a case number, year and type of case to get the information.
Information about application number, applicant name, the name of the respondent, case status, appeal number, etc. Sarkari Resulta. Post Related Important Links. Click Here.
Cause List. Allahabad Bench. Lucknow Bench. Display Board. Status Reports.
Full Bench Decisions. Roll of Advocates. Notifications regarding E-Court.